Show pageBacklinksCite current pageExport to PDFBack to top This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong. meaning acceptable and useful, but not outstanding. If you want it to go from "decent" to "strong" or even "excellent," here are three simple upgrades you could make: Clarify Bias Handling: Explicitly state how you minimized bias — for example, "two independent reviewers performed the selection and data extraction." Right now, it's not clear. Discuss Heterogeneity: Mention that different studies measured deviation differently (2D vs 3D, tip vs entry point, etc.) and that no meta-analysis was performed because of this heterogeneity. Tone Down the Conclusion Slightly: Instead of affirming strongly that deviations don't affect spinal fusion, you could say: "Minor deviations appear not to significantly compromise screw placement accuracy, although direct evidence linking deviation to fusion outcomes remains limited." That way, your conclusion sounds solid and cautious — like in a top-tier systematic review. decent.txt Last modified: 2025/04/27 11:26by 127.0.0.1