Show pageBacklinksCite current pageExport to PDFBack to top This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong. ====== Allograft Implant ====== [[Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion]] is commonly performed using an [[allograft]] or [[autograft]] [[implant]] and anterior screw-supported plate. ---- Common [[interbody graft]] options for [[anterior cervical discectomy and fusion]] (ACDF) include structural [[allograft]] and [[polyetheretherketone]] ([[PEEK]]). PEEK has gained popularity due to its radiolucency and its elastic modulus, which is similar to that of [[bone]]. The authors sought to compare the rates of [[pseudarthrosis]], a lack of solid bone growth across the disc space, and the need for [[revision surgery]] with the use of grafts made of [[allogeneic bone]] versus PEEK. The authors retrospectively reviewed 127 cases in which patients had undergone a 1-level [[ACDF]] followed by at least 1 year of radiographic follow-up. Data on age, sex, [[body mass index]], [[tobacco]] use, [[pseudarthrosis]], and the [[reoperation]] rate for pseudarthrosis were collected. These data were analyzed by performing a Pearson's chi-square test. Of 127 patients, 56 had received PEEK implants and 71 had received [[allograft]]s. Forty-six of the PEEK implants (82%) were stand-alone devices. There were no significant differences between the 2 treatment groups with respect to patient age, sex, or body mass index. Twenty-nine (52%) of 56 patients with PEEK implants demonstrated radiographic evidence of [[pseudarthrosis]], compared to 7 (10%) of 71 patients with structural allografts (p < 0.001, OR 9.82; 95% CI 3.836-25.139). Seven patients with PEEK implants required reoperation for pseudarthrosis, compared to 1 patient with an allograft (p = 0.01, OR 10.00; 95% CI 1.192-83.884). There was no significant difference in tobacco use between the PEEK and allograft groups (p = 0.586). The results of this study demonstrate that the use of PEEK devices in 1-level ACDF is associated with a significantly higher rate of radiographically demonstrated pseudarthrosis and need for revision surgery compared with the use of [[allograft]]s. Surgeons should be aware of this when deciding on interbody graft options, and [[reimbursement]] policies should reflect these discrepancies ((Fivefold higher rate of pseudarthrosis with polyetheretherketone interbody device than with structural allograft used for 1-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Oct 1:1-6. doi: 10.3171/2018.7.SPINE18531. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 30485200. )). allograft_implant.txt Last modified: 2024/06/07 02:54by 127.0.0.1