transverse_sinus_stenting_for_idiopathic_intracranial_hypertension

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
transverse_sinus_stenting_for_idiopathic_intracranial_hypertension [2025/06/30 22:34] – [Overall Verdict] administradortransverse_sinus_stenting_for_idiopathic_intracranial_hypertension [2025/06/30 22:35] (current) – [Overall Verdict] administrador
Line 116: Line 116:
  
 **Bottom Line:**   **Bottom Line:**  
-TVS stenting appears superior to CSF shunting in terms of repeat intervention rates and healthcare utilization, but [[methodological limitation]]s and lack of detailed clinical granularity curb its practice-changing value.+TVS stenting appears superior to CSF shunting in terms of repeat intervention rates and healthcare utilization, but [[methodological limitation]]s and lack of detailed [[clinical granularity]] curb its practice-changing value.
  
 **Rating:** 6.5/10 **Rating:** 6.5/10
  • transverse_sinus_stenting_for_idiopathic_intracranial_hypertension.txt
  • Last modified: 2025/06/30 22:35
  • by administrador