Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
transient_cortical_blindness [2025/06/30 21:30] – [Case reports] administrador | transient_cortical_blindness [2025/06/30 21:32] (current) – administrador | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Children may develop transient cortical blindness lasting 1-2 days , usually after a blow to the back of the [[head]]. | Children may develop transient cortical blindness lasting 1-2 days , usually after a blow to the back of the [[head]]. | ||
- | ===== Case reports ===== | ||
- | |||
- | In a **Single-[[patient]] [[case report]]** detailing transient cortical blindness following [[pineal region meningioma surgery]] | ||
- | **Yip et al.** | ||
- | from the University of Edinburgh and NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK. | ||
- | published in *BMJ Case Reports*, **June 27, | ||
- | to highlight the occurrence of **transient cortical blindness** following [[occipital lobe retraction]] during a pineal meningioma resection and raise awareness about anatomical risk factors. | ||
- | |||
- | ===== Key Clinical Course ===== | ||
- | - Middle-aged woman with pineal meningioma causing triventriculomegaly. | ||
- | - Underwent ETV followed by tumor resection via **parieto-occipital interhemispheric approach**. | ||
- | - Post-op: **complete cortical blindness**, | ||
- | - Gradual visual recovery: partial by 3 weeks, full by 8 months. | ||
- | - Implicated cause: **bilateral occipital retraction injury** despite uneventful surgery | ||
- | ((Yip NZW, Barbour-Hastie C, Barron P, McKee JB, Kaliaperumal C. Transient cortical blindness following occipital lobe retraction in a pineal region meningioma resection. BMJ Case Rep. 2025 Jun 27; | ||
- | |||
- | ===== Critical Review ===== | ||
- | - **Strengths**: | ||
- | - Describes a rare but important surgical complication, | ||
- | - Clear clinical timeline with good recovery documentation. | ||
- | - Highlights subtleties of non-ischemic cortical dysfunction and relevance of fMRI in post-op assessment. | ||
- | |||
- | - **Limitations**: | ||
- | - Lack of **functional imaging** (e.g., fMRI, perfusion studies) to correlate with presumed retraction injury. | ||
- | - No intraoperative monitoring data (e.g., visual evoked potentials) or detail on retraction technique. | ||
- | - Tentorial angle mention is appropriate, | ||
- | - Single case, hence anecdotal and non-generalizable. | ||
- | |||
- | ===== Final Verdict ===== | ||
- | - **Score**: 4.5/10 — educationally useful for neurosurgical awareness but limited by lack of objective neurophysiologic or imaging data. | ||
- | |||
- | ===== Takeaway for Neurosurgeons ===== | ||
- | [[Occipital lobe retraction]]—even absent radiographic ischemia—can cause **reversible cortical blindness**, | ||
- | |||
- | ===== Bottom Line ===== | ||
- | Transient cortical blindness may follow [[occipital lobe]] manipulation without infarction; full recovery is possible but underscores need for cautious occipital retraction during pineal region surgeries. | ||
- | |||
- | ===== Citation ===== | ||
- | Transient cortical blindness following occipital lobe retraction in a pineal region meningioma resection. | ||
- | Yip NZW, et al. *BMJ Case Rep.* 2025; | ||
- | Corresponding author: Catriona Barbour-Hastie, | ||