smith-petersen_osteotomy

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
smith-petersen_osteotomy [2025/07/19 00:18] – [🧠 Clinical Pearls] administradorsmith-petersen_osteotomy [2025/07/19 00:19] (current) – [Critical Review] administrador
Line 63: Line 63:
  
 * **Key concerns**   * **Key concerns**  
-  1. **Short‑term endpoint**: 6 week follow‑up may not capture delayed neurologic recovery or complications.   + 
-  2. **Selection bias**: Surgeons may have preferentially selected PCO in more severe cases where improvement was expected—or vice‑versa.   +1. **Short‑term endpoint**: 6 week follow‑up may not capture delayed neurologic recovery or complications.   
-  3. **IONM changes**: Higher intraoperative monitoring events in deteriorated group suggests surgery complexity—not fully adjusted.+  Â 
 +2. **Selection bias**: Surgeons may have preferentially selected PCO in more severe cases where improvement was expected—or vice‑versa.   
 +  Â 
 +3. **IONM changes**: Higher intraoperative monitoring events in deteriorated group suggests surgery complexity—not fully adjusted.
  
 ==== Final Verdict ====   ==== Final Verdict ====  
  • smith-petersen_osteotomy.txt
  • Last modified: 2025/07/19 00:19
  • by administrador