Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
progav [2024/06/07 02:51] – created - external edit 127.0.0.1 | progav [2025/07/03 19:37] (current) – administrador | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
// | // | ||
+ | ---- | ||
- | + | ---- | |
- | **Multiple-Choice Test** | + | |
- | + | ||
- | | + | |
- | | + | |
- | | + | |
- | - [X] c. To adjust shunt settings | + | |
- | - [ ] d. To detect magnetic fields | + | |
- | + | ||
- | - How can the setting of the ProGav Miethke shunt be adjusted? | + | |
- | - [ ] a. By changing the valve' | + | |
- | - [X] b. By using external magnetic adjustment | + | |
- | - [ ] c. By applying pressure to the scalp | + | |
- | - [ ] d. By adjusting the gravitational unit | + | |
- | + | ||
- | - What is the role of the brake system in the ProGav Miethke shunt? | + | |
- | - [X] a. To hold the rotor in place during MRI scans | + | |
- | - [ ] b. To prevent the shunt from draining cerebrospinal fluid | + | |
- | - [ ] c. To adjust the shunt' | + | |
- | - [ ] d. To measure the patient' | + | |
- | + | ||
- | - What is the main concern regarding the interaction between the iPhone 12 and programmable ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts? | + | |
- | - [X] a. Re-programming of shunt settings | + | |
- | - [ ] b. Magnetic interference with shunt function | + | |
- | - [ ] c. Risk of overdrainage | + | |
- | - [ ] d. Pressure changes in the shunt | + | |
- | + | ||
- | - How did the study find the iPhone 12's interaction with programmable VP shunts, such as the ProGav Miethke? | + | |
- | - [ ] a. The iPhone 12 caused re-programming of shunt settings | + | |
- | - [X] b. The iPhone 12 had no effect on the shunt settings | + | |
- | - [ ] c. The iPhone 12 increased the risk of overdrainage | + | |
- | - [ ] d. The iPhone 12 was not tested with VP shunts | + | |
- | + | ||
- | - What is the significance of the MRI compatibility of medical implants and devices? | + | |
- | - [ ] a. It allows for shunt settings to be determined using MRI scans. | + | |
- | - [X] b. It enables patients to undergo MRI scans without shunt interference. | + | |
- | - [ ] c. It reduces the risk of re-programming shunt settings during MRI. | + | |
- | - [ ] d. It makes MRI scans safer for patients with VP shunts. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | - What did the study conclude regarding the MRI safety of programmable VP shunt valves for 7T MR systems? | + | |
- | - [ ] a. Programmable shunt valves are safe for all 7T MR systems. | + | |
- | - [X] b. All programmable shunt valves are MR-unsafe for 7T systems. | + | |
- | - [ ] c. Novel programming mechanisms can make shunt valves conditional for 7T MR systems. | + | |
- | - [ ] d. The safety of programmable shunt valves for 7T MR systems needs further evaluation. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | - What is the primary purpose of the Birmingham standardized IIH shunt protocol? | + | |
- | - [ ] a. To increase the diameter of the shunt valve | + | |
- | - [ ] b. To reduce the use of adjustable shunt valves | + | |
- | - [X] c. To standardize CSF shunting in IIH patients | + | |
- | - [ ] d. To eliminate the need for VPS insertion | + | |
- | + | ||
- | - What is the primary focus of the study related to the determination of programmable shunt settings using CT scans? | + | |
- | - [ ] a. To assess the compatibility of shunt settings with CT scans | + | |
- | - [ ] b. To validate the MRI safety of programmable shunt valves | + | |
- | - [X] c. To evaluate the feasibility of determining shunt settings using CT scans | + | |
- | - [ ] d. To determine the brake mechanism of programmable shunts | + | |
- | + | ||
- | - What is the key finding of the study on programmable shunt settings and CT scans? | + | |
- | - [ ] a. The shunt settings cannot be determined using CT scans. | + | |
- | - [X] b. The shunt settings can be determined accurately using CT scans. | + | |
- | - [ ] c. The brake mechanism in programmable shunts is ineffective during CT scans. | + | |
- | - [ ] d. The MRI compatibility of programmable shunt valves is not affected by CT scans. | + | |
====== Latest PubMed Related Articles ====== | ====== Latest PubMed Related Articles ====== | ||
Line 163: | Line 102: | ||
===== Case series ===== | ===== Case series ===== | ||
- | [[ProGav case series]] | + | [[ProGav case series]]. |
+ | |||
+ | ===== Test ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **Multiple-Choice Test** | ||
+ | |||
+ | - What is the primary purpose of the ProGav Miethke shunt? | ||
+ | - [ ] a. To measure intracranial pressure | ||
+ | - [ ] b. To drain cerebrospinal fluid | ||
+ | - [X] c. To adjust shunt settings | ||
+ | - [ ] d. To detect magnetic fields | ||
+ | |||
+ | - How can the setting of the ProGav Miethke shunt be adjusted? | ||
+ | - [ ] a. By changing the valve' | ||
+ | - [X] b. By using external magnetic adjustment | ||
+ | - [ ] c. By applying pressure to the scalp | ||
+ | - [ ] d. By adjusting the gravitational unit | ||
+ | |||
+ | - What is the role of the brake system in the ProGav Miethke shunt? | ||
+ | - [X] a. To hold the rotor in place during MRI scans | ||
+ | - [ ] b. To prevent the shunt from draining cerebrospinal fluid | ||
+ | - [ ] c. To adjust the shunt' | ||
+ | - [ ] d. To measure the patient' | ||
+ | |||
+ | - What is the main concern regarding the interaction between the iPhone 12 and programmable ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts? | ||
+ | - [X] a. Re-programming of shunt settings | ||
+ | - [ ] b. Magnetic interference with shunt function | ||
+ | - [ ] c. Risk of overdrainage | ||
+ | - [ ] d. Pressure changes in the shunt | ||
+ | |||
+ | - How did the study find the iPhone 12's interaction with programmable VP shunts, such as the ProGav Miethke? | ||
+ | - [ ] a. The iPhone 12 caused re-programming of shunt settings | ||
+ | - [X] b. The iPhone 12 had no effect on the shunt settings | ||
+ | - [ ] c. The iPhone 12 increased the risk of overdrainage | ||
+ | - [ ] d. The iPhone 12 was not tested with VP shunts | ||
+ | |||
+ | - What is the significance of the MRI compatibility of medical implants and devices? | ||
+ | - [ ] a. It allows for shunt settings to be determined using MRI scans. | ||
+ | - [X] b. It enables patients to undergo MRI scans without shunt interference. | ||
+ | - [ ] c. It reduces the risk of re-programming shunt settings during MRI. | ||
+ | - [ ] d. It makes MRI scans safer for patients with VP shunts. | ||
+ | |||
+ | - What did the study conclude regarding the MRI safety of programmable VP shunt valves for 7T MR systems? | ||
+ | - [ ] a. Programmable shunt valves are safe for all 7T MR systems. | ||
+ | - [X] b. All programmable shunt valves are MR-unsafe for 7T systems. | ||
+ | - [ ] c. Novel programming mechanisms can make shunt valves conditional for 7T MR systems. | ||
+ | - [ ] d. The safety of programmable shunt valves for 7T MR systems needs further evaluation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | - What is the primary purpose of the Birmingham standardized IIH shunt protocol? | ||
+ | - [ ] a. To increase the diameter of the shunt valve | ||
+ | - [ ] b. To reduce the use of adjustable shunt valves | ||
+ | - [X] c. To standardize CSF shunting in IIH patients | ||
+ | - [ ] d. To eliminate the need for VPS insertion | ||
+ | |||
+ | - What is the primary focus of the study related to the determination of programmable shunt settings using CT scans? | ||
+ | - [ ] a. To assess the compatibility of shunt settings with CT scans | ||
+ | - [ ] b. To validate the MRI safety of programmable shunt valves | ||
+ | - [X] c. To evaluate the feasibility of determining shunt settings using CT scans | ||
+ | - [ ] d. To determine the brake mechanism of programmable shunts | ||
+ | |||
+ | - What is the key finding of the study on programmable shunt settings and CT scans? | ||
+ | - [ ] a. The shunt settings cannot be determined using CT scans. | ||
+ | - [X] b. The shunt settings can be determined accurately using CT scans. | ||
+ | - [ ] c. The brake mechanism in programmable shunts is ineffective during CT scans. | ||
+ | - [ ] d. The MRI compatibility of programmable shunt valves is not affected by CT scans. | ||
====References==== | ====References==== |