Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
posterior_fossa_decompression_indications [2025/07/10 14:05] – administrador | posterior_fossa_decompression_indications [2025/07/10 14:06] (current) – administrador | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
Conditions such as platybasia, clival abnormalities, | Conditions such as platybasia, clival abnormalities, | ||
The decision to perform PFD depends on the severity of symptoms, radiological findings (MRI/CT), and response to conservative management. It is crucial to weigh the benefits of decompression against potential complications such as CSF leaks, pseudomeningocele, | The decision to perform PFD depends on the severity of symptoms, radiological findings (MRI/CT), and response to conservative management. It is crucial to weigh the benefits of decompression against potential complications such as CSF leaks, pseudomeningocele, | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===== Chiari Malformation Type I Decompression for Disorders of Thought ===== | ||
- | |||
- | In a [[editorial commentary]] | ||
- | Annie I. Drapeau, and Anthony M. Kaufmann, | ||
- | from the University of Manitoba, [[Winnipeg]] | ||
- | published in the [[Journal of Neurosurgery]] | ||
- | to critically reflect on the [[burgeoning hypothesis]] that [[Chiari malformation type I]] (CM-I) may contribute to [[cognitive]] and [[affective dysfunction]] and that [[posterior fossa decompression]] (PFD) might yield therapeutic [[benefit]]s beyond relief of pressure-related symptoms. | ||
- | The [[author]]s caution against the premature [[endorsement]] of PFD for neuropsychiatric complaints in CM-I patients without classic [[decompression]] [[indication]]s. They underscore the need for [[rigor]]ous [[control]] of [[confounding]] [[variable]]s, | ||
- | ((Drapeau AI, Kaufmann AM. Editorial. Considering [[Chiari malformation type I]] decompression for disorders of [[thought]]. J Neurosurg. 2025 Feb 21; | ||
- | |||
- | ==== Critical Review ==== | ||
- | |||
- | This [[editorial]] is a necessary tempering of [[enthusiasm]] following Henry et al.'s exploratory [[prospective]] study on [[cognitive]] and affective changes post-PFD in CM-I. The [[author]]s provide a methodologically grounded [[critique]], | ||
- | ((Henry LC, McDowell MM, Stephenson TL, Crittenden JB, Byrd AL, Fernández-de Thomas RJ, Chang YF, Nowicki KW, Mantena R, Strick PL, Friedlander RM. Pre[[decompression]] and postdecompression [[cognitive]] and [[affective]] [[change]]s in [[Chiari malformation type I.]] J Neurosurg. 2025 Feb 21; | ||
- | |||
- | The editorial' | ||
- | |||
- | Its limitations are those of the editorial format—it does not provide new data but rather serves to contextualize existing results. However, as a scholarly commentary, it is exemplary in tone, scope, and scientific restraint. | ||
- | |||
- | **Final Verdict:** An intellectually rigorous and judicious editorial that should guide neurosurgeons and researchers in critically appraising speculative surgical indications. A must-read for those exploring neuropsychiatric extensions of CM-I pathology. | ||
- | |||
- | **Takeaway for Neurosurgeons: | ||
- | |||
- | see [[Posterior Fossa Decompression for Chiari Malformation Indications]] | ||
- | |||
- | **[[Bottom Line]]:** The [[cerebellum]]’s [[cognitive]] [[role]] is intriguing, see [[Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome]]. | ||
- | But current evidence does not justify PFD in asymptomatic CM-I patients with only psychiatric symptoms. | ||
- | |||
- | **[[Rating]]: | ||
- | |||
- | **Publication Date:** February 21, 2025 | ||
- | |||
- | **Corresponding Author:** [[annie.drapeau@umanitoba.ca]] | ||
- | |||
- | **Categories: | ||
- | |||
- | **Tags:** Chiari malformation type I, posterior fossa decompression, | ||