Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- plexiform_neurofibroma_prognosis [2025/07/18 05:44] – administrador
+++ plexiform_neurofibroma_prognosis [2025/07/18 05:51] (current) – administrador
@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 PMCID: PMC2095617.
 )).
-===== Retrospective cohort analysis =====
-===== Involvement of Cranial Nerve Ganglion as an Independent Risk Factor for Malignant Transformation of Head and Neck Plexiform Neurofibromas in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 =====
-In a [[retrospective]] [[cohort]] [[analysis]] of patients undergoing [[surgical resection]] of [[head and neck plexiform neurofibroma]]s (PNF) at a [[tertiary]] [[neuro‑oncology]] [[center]].
-Gu et al. from the Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai (Departments of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Pathology, Neurosurgery)
-published in the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Journal
-to identify risk factors—particularly [[cranial nerve]] [[ganglion]] involvement—predicting [[malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor]] (MPNST) [[transformation]] in [[head]] and [[neck]] PNF among [[NF1]] patients.
-__**Main conclusions:**__
-- Four percent (19/470) of clinically treated head & neck PNF became malignant.
-- Independent risk factor: involvement of cranial nerve ganglia (adjusted OR 3.10; 95% CI 1.07–9.00).
-- Ganglion–involved PNF transformed faster (HR 7.20; 95% CI 2.33–22.28), accelerating time to MPNST by ~36%
-((Gu Y, Zhu B, Huang J, Long M, Wang W, Wu Y, Wang Z, Li Q. Involvement of Cranial Nerve Ganglion as an Independent Risk Factor for Malignant Transformation of Head and Neck Plexiform Neurofibromas in Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2025 Jul 8. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012302. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40674689.))
-===== Critical review =====
-*✅ Strengths:*
-- Large, single‑center cohort with surgery-confirmed diagnoses over 11 years (2012–2023).
-- Robust statistical methods (logistic + Cox regression) identify both risk magnitude and temporal acceleration.
-- Clinically actionable endpoint: close surveillance and earlier intervention for ganglion‑involved PNF.
-*⚠️ Limitations:*
-- Retrospective design; possible selection bias—only surgically treated cases included.
-- PNF heterogeneity in size, volume, and precise anatomical pathways may influence results but lacked standardized imaging metrics.
-- External validity limited: single‑center data from China; demographic & management differences may apply elsewhere.
-*🧠 Methodology critique:*
-- Appropriate use of multivariable logistic regression; however, only a few covariates tested. Other confounders (e.g., NF1 genotype, prior radiotherapy, growth rate) omitted.
-- Cox model hazard ratio (7.20) is large but CI wide—suggests smaller sample or variable follow-up times.
-*🎯 Clinical takeaway for neurosurgeons:*
-Evaluate head and neck PNF for cranial nerve ganglion involvement via imaging (MRI/CT); if present, patients should undergo intensified monitoring (e.g., 6‑month imaging) and early biopsy or resection upon suspicious changes.
-__**Final verdict:**__ 7 / 10
-A solid [[observational]] study that highlights a radiographically discernible risk factor with clinical implications. Would benefit from prospective validation and inclusion of additional predictive variables.
-__**Bottom line:**__
-Cranial nerve ganglion involvement in head & neck PNF triples malignant transformation risk and accelerates progression—this marker should prompt more aggressive monitoring and management.
-===== Metadata =====
-Category:
-  - Neurofibromatosis Type 1
-  - [[Peripheral Nerve Tumor]]s
-  - Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor
-Tags:
-neurofibromatosis type 1, plexiform neurofibroma, MPNST, risk factor, cranial nerve ganglion, retrospective cohort
-===== Citation =====
-Corresponding author email: [[wangzichao@sjtu.edu.cn]]