magicapp

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
magicapp [2025/07/01 16:24] – administradormagicapp [2025/07/01 16:27] (current) – administrador
Line 54: Line 54:
 **Recommendation:** Use only as a **publishing shell** for guideline dissemination. For genuine evidence synthesis, rely on tools like **RevMan, RoB2, Epistemonikos, or independent critical appraisal**. **Recommendation:** Use only as a **publishing shell** for guideline dissemination. For genuine evidence synthesis, rely on tools like **RevMan, RoB2, Epistemonikos, or independent critical appraisal**.
  
 +====== Better Alternatives to MAGICapp ======
 +
 +=== 🧠 Cochrane RevMan Web (https://revman.cochrane.org) ===
 +  * ✅ Full platform for **systematic reviews and meta-analysis**
 +  * ✅ Supports:
 +    * Data extraction
 +    * Forest plots
 +    * Heterogeneity analysis
 +    * Subgroup analysis
 +  * ✅ Integrates with GRADE judgments but allows pre-GRADE analytical rigor
 +  * ➕ **Why it’s better than MAGICapp**:  
 +    Builds the actual synthesis logic and statistical appraisal that MAGICapp only displays.
 +
 +=== 🔍 Epistemonikos + L.OVE Platform (https://www.epistemonikos.org) ===
 +  * ✅ Tracks **living evidence** with automated mapping via the L.OVE platform
 +  * ✅ Links PICO questions to systematic reviews and primary studies
 +  * ✅ Allows real-time surveillance of growing or shifting evidence landscapes
 +  * ➕ **Why it’s better than MAGICapp**:  
 +    Offers dynamic monitoring of evidence—MAGICapp updates only when manually edited.
 +
 +=== 🤖 Elicit + RoB2 + GRADE-R (multi-tool suite) ===
 +
 +  * **Elicit (https://elicit.org)** – AI tool to extract outcomes, sample sizes, PICO, and compare trials
 +  * **RoB 2.0** – Structured tool for assessing risk of bias in RCTs
 +  * **GRADE-R** – (Internal WHO tool) Allows scenario-based modeling of certainty ratings
 +
 +  * ✅ Enables true **critical appraisal and interpretation**
 +  * ✅ Goes beyond “certainty labels” to model bias and contextual judgment
 +  * ➕ **Why it’s better than MAGICapp**:  
 +    MAGICapp wraps GRADE in a UI; this trio performs **actual evaluation logic**.
 +
 +=== 📊 Comparative Summary Table ===
 +
 +^ Tool / Platform             ^ Strengths                                               ^ Why It’s Better Than MAGICapp                                ^
 +| RevMan Web                  | Meta-analysis, data extraction, full synthesis workflow | Creates and tests evidence synthesis, not just publishes it   |
 +| Epistemonikos + L.OVE       | Evidence surveillance, PICO mapping, living updates     | Dynamic and automated—MAGICapp is static and manual           |
 +| GRADE-R + RoB2              | Certainty modeling and bias detection                   | Transparent and rule-based vs opaque narrative logic          |
 +| Elicit                      | AI-powered study interpretation                         | Performs intelligent comparison—not just table presentation   |
 +
 +=== 🧠 Final Recommendation ===
 +  * Use **[[RevMan Web]]** when conducting systematic reviews or producing quantitative synthesis.
 +  * Use **[[Epistemonikos]] + [[L.OVE]]** when updating or monitoring evidence in real time.
 +  * Use **[[GRADE-R]], [[RoB2]], and [[Elicit]]** for structured appraisal, bias modeling, and transparent grading.
 +  * Use **[[MAGICapp]]** only as a **publishing shell** once the hard analytical work is done elsewhere.
  
  
  • magicapp.txt
  • Last modified: 2025/07/01 16:27
  • by administrador