Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- asreview [2025/07/01 16:48] – administrador
+++ asreview [2025/07/01 16:50] (current) – administrador
@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 **Recommendation:** Use ASReview only as an experimental adjunct to established review processes, not as a replacement for rigorous human screening and judgment.
+====== Better Alternatives to ASReview ======
+=== 🥇 Covidence ===
+  * ✅ Intuitive, widely adopted systematic review platform
+  * ✅ AI-assisted screening suggestions integrated into workflows
+  * ✅ Strong collaboration, version control, and audit trails
+  * ✅ Integrates well with reference managers and export tools
+  * ➕ **Why better than ASReview:**
+    Robust workflow support combined with user-friendly AI assistance
+=== 🔍 EPPI-Reviewer ===
+  * ✅ Advanced machine learning and text mining for screening prioritization
+  * ✅ Supports multiple review stages including bias assessment and data extraction
+  * ✅ Comprehensive workflow integration and audit features
+  * ➕ **Why better than ASReview:**
+    More mature AI features integrated within full systematic review platform
+=== 🤖 RobotReviewer ===
+  * ✅ Automated risk of bias assessment complementing screening
+  * ✅ Provides explanations for bias judgments improving transparency
+  * ✅ Can be integrated into review workflows for enhanced efficiency
+  * ➕ **Why better than ASReview:**
+    Extends automation beyond screening into critical appraisal stages
+=== 🧰 Rayyan ===
+  * ✅ User-friendly screening tool with AI suggestions and conflict resolution
+  * ✅ Supports team collaboration and manual screening alongside AI
+  * ✅ Free, web-based, accessible interface
+  * ➕ **Why better than ASReview:**
+    Balanced AI assistance with ease of use and accessibility
+=== 📊 Summary Table ===
+^ Tool           ^ Strengths                                   ^ Why Better Than ASReview                    ^
+| Covidence      | Integrated AI screening, collaboration     | Robust workflow, team-friendly, widely used |
+| EPPI-Reviewer  | Advanced ML text mining, full workflow     | Mature AI and review stage integration       |
+| RobotReviewer  | Automated bias assessment with transparency| Extends automation to critical appraisal     |
+| Rayyan         | Easy to use AI-assisted screening          | Accessible, collaborative, balanced AI       |
+=== 🧠 Final Recommendation ===
+  * Use **[[Covidence]]** for streamlined, team-based AI-assisted screening and review management.
+  * Use **[[EPPI-Reviewer]]** if you require mature AI features integrated into comprehensive review workflows.
+  * Use **[[RobotReviewer]]** to augment screening with automated risk of bias assessment.
+  * Use **[[Rayyan]]** for accessible, collaborative screening with helpful AI suggestions.
+  * Use **[[ASReview]]** primarily for experimental or niche AI-active learning projects.