anterior_skull_base_reconstruction

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
anterior_skull_base_reconstruction [2025/05/16 06:47] – administradoranterior_skull_base_reconstruction [2025/05/16 06:48] (current) – administrador
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 Conclusion: Skull base reconstruction and post-ESBS management is highly complex with a wide variety of practice patterns and expert strategies. Further research of higher quality evidence is warranted to identify optimal management patterns, though the current work aims to inform surgeons on these controversial areas by drawing from numerous experiences Conclusion: Skull base reconstruction and post-ESBS management is highly complex with a wide variety of practice patterns and expert strategies. Further research of higher quality evidence is warranted to identify optimal management patterns, though the current work aims to inform surgeons on these controversial areas by drawing from numerous experiences
-((There is limited consensus on endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) reconstruction principles. This study aims to generate comprehensive themes regarding ESBS reconstruction by pooling the experiences of ESBS experts, with comparison to a literature review of current published evidence. +((Kuan EC, Talati V, Patel JA, Nguyen TV, Abiri A, Pang JC, Goshtasbi K, Liu L, Craig JR, Papagiannopoulos P, Phillips KM, Tajudeen BA, Adappa ND, Palmer JN, Sedaghat AR, Wang EW, Anand V, Batra PS, Bergsneider M, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Bleier BS, Cappabianca P, Carrau RL, Casiano RR, Castelnuovo P, Cavallo LM, Cohen MA, Dallan I, Eloy JA, El-Sayed IH, Evans JJ, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Ferrari M, Froelich S, Gardner PA, Georgalas C, Gray ST, Hanna EY, Harvey RJ, Hong SD, Hwang PH, Kelly DF, Kong DS, Lan MY, Lee JYK, Levine CG, Liu JK, Locatelli D, Meço C, McKean EL, Nicolai P, Nyquist GG, Omura K, Passeri T, Patel ZM, Celda MP, Neto CP, Rabinowitz MR, Rabinowitz MR, Raza SM, Recinos PF, Rosen MR, Sargi ZB, Schlosser RJ, Schwartz TH, Sindwani R, Snyderman CH, Stamm AC, Thorp BD, Turri-Zanoni M, Wang MB, Wang WH, Witterick IJ, Won TB, Woodworth BA, Wormald PJ, Zada G, Su SY. Expert Strategies: Skull Base Reconstruction-Global Perspectives, Insights, and Algorithms through a MixedMethods Approach. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2025 May 15:e23596. doi: 10.1002/alr.23596. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40371737.)).
- +
-Methods: Structured qualitative interviews of ESBS experts regarding postoperative management and reconstruction of various defect locations were conducted. +
- +
-Results: A total of 68 experts comprising 40 academic teams across 13 countries with an average of 18 years of ESBS experience were included. We propose 10 stepwise algorithms for common skull base reconstruction scenarios based on these expert interviews. When available, the nasoseptal flap is used for all high_flow cerebrospinal leak defects. Multilayered reconstruction is favored at all anatomical subsites with increasing number of layers for increasing defect size and complexity. Heterogeneity exists in terms of inlay technique and materials, free grafting versus various pedicled flap options for low-flow defects or in the absence of a nasal septum, nasal packing, tissue sealant, lumbar drain use, and postoperative management. Commonalities and discrepancies between experts were summarized. +
- +
-Conclusion: Skull base reconstruction and post-ESBS management is highly complex with a wide variety of practice patterns and expert strategies. Further research of higher quality evidence is warranted to identify optimal management patterns, though the current work aims to inform surgeons on these controversial areas by drawing from numerous experiences.)). +
- +
  • anterior_skull_base_reconstruction.txt
  • Last modified: 2025/05/16 06:48
  • by administrador