annexin_a1

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
annexin_a1 [2025/07/06 17:19] administradorannexin_a1 [2025/07/06 17:28] (current) administrador
Line 27: Line 27:
   * Promotes immune evasion and tumor progression   * Promotes immune evasion and tumor progression
  
-((Discov Oncol. 2025 Jul;16(1):1269. doi:10.1007/s12672-025-03112-y))+In a [[Translational research]] with bulk [[RNA sequencing analysis]], scRNA-seq, and [[in vitro]] [[validation]]   
 +Hong Hu *et al.*   
 +from the Harbin Medical University 
 +published in the **Journal:** [[Discover Oncology]]   
 +to elucidate how [[methionine]] metabolism contributes to the immunosuppressive [[tumor microenvironment]] in [[glioma]]s, with a focus on [[macrophage]] polarization mediated by [[ANXA1]].   
 +Elevated methionine metabolism in [[glioma cell]]s correlates with higher [[WHO]] [[tumor]] [[grade]] and an immunosuppressive microenvironment. High [[methionine]] metabolic activity fosters M2 macrophage polarization via ANXA1, which is downregulated upon methionine deprivation 
 +((Hu H, Huang Y, Li J, Liu R, Li H, Cai M, Chen H, Wang N, Yang S, Wang K, Teng L, Liu H. [[Glioma]] promotes [[macrophage immunosuppressive phenotype]] through [[ANXA1]] in a [[methionine metabolism]]-dependent manner. Discov Oncol. 2025 Jul 6;16(1):1269. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-03112-y. PMID: 40618309.))
 + 
 +==== Critical Review ==== 
 +This study leverages [[multi-omics]] datasets, particularly MMA-scoring and scRNA-seq, to draw a novel link between methionine metabolism and the immune suppressive phenotype in gliomas, focusing on macrophage polarization. The authors make a credible case for metabolic reprogramming as a driver of glioma malignancy. However, there are caveats: 
 + 
 +- **Strengths:** The integration of bulk and single-cell RNA-seq enhances resolution, and the use of in vitro validation lends support to mechanistic claims. The correlation between MMA-scores and glioma grade is statistically compelling. 
 + 
 +- **Limitations:** Despite the innovative premise, the study relies heavily on correlative data. Functional validation, particularly in vivo or using clinical samples, is lacking. The assertion that ANXA1-mediated macrophage polarization is solely Met-dependent needs further biochemical interrogation. Furthermore, patient sample heterogeneity and potential confounders are not adequately addressed. 
 + 
 +- **Mechanistic Gap:** While ANXA1 expression is shown to respond to Met availability, its downstream effects on macrophage behavior are inferred rather than mechanistically dissected. 
 + 
 +- **Clinical Implications:** The study's translational relevance is speculative. No clinical outcome data (e.g., survival stratified by MMA-score) are presented, and therapeutic exploitation remains conceptual. 
 + 
 +**Final Verdict:** Ambitious and methodologically diverse, but insufficiently validated for [[clinical translation]]. 
 + 
 +**Takeaway for the Practicing Neurosurgeon:** While methionine metabolism may signal tumor aggressiveness and immune evasion, it is not yet a practical biomarker or therapeutic target without deeper functional validation. 
 + 
 +**Bottom Line:** Promising hypothesis linking [[glioma metabolism]] to immune suppression via [[ANXA1]]; more robust causal evidence is needed before clinical application. 
 + 
 +**Rating:** 6.5/10 
 + 
 +**Title:** Glioma promotes macrophage immunosuppressive phenotype through ANXA1 in a methionine metabolism-dependent manner   
 +**Citation:** Hu H *et al.* Discover Oncology. 2025 Jul 6;16(1):1269. doi:10.1007/s12672-025-03112-y   
 +**Publication Date:** July 6, 2025   
 +**Corresponding Author Email:** liuhuaileinsdm@hrbmu.edu.cn 
 + 
  
 === Summary === === Summary ===
  • annexin_a1.txt
  • Last modified: 2025/07/06 17:28
  • by administrador