🧠 Neurosurgery Wiki — FAQ

1. What exactly is Neurosurgery Wiki?

A radical, independent platform to rethink neurosurgery in the digital age.
We dissect articles, videos, and dogmas — not to impress, but to clarify.


2. Who’s behind this project?

A growing network of neurosurgeons and thinkers who believe that critical analysis beats academic theater.
We don’t evaluate titles. We evaluate ideas.


3. Can I contribute?

Yes — if you have something worth sharing.
A clinical case that teaches more than it impresses, a critical review that questions the mainstream, or just an honest question no one is asking.


4. What kind of content do you publish?

  • Critical reviews of articles and surgical videos

  • Honest case analyses (not academic makeup)

  • Essays, reflections, and clinical provocations

  • Tools that help us operate and think better


5. Do you accept formal journal-style articles?

Only if they have soul. If it reads like a press release in APA format — keep it.
We’re not here to polish your metrics.


6. Why no fancy conferences or glossy books?

Because chandeliers don’t make knowledge brighter.
We publish what helps — not what counts.


7. Can I quote, share, or remix your content?

Yes. With credit, with care, and with the same critical spirit.
We’re a wiki — not a walled garden.


8. Do you use AI?

We use it like a scalpel: precisely, critically, and never blindly.
AI is a tool, not a gospel. We train ourselves, not just the models.


9. Where do I start?

Read what makes you uncomfortable.
Contribute when you’ve thought it through.
And remember: in neurosurgery, thinking is not optional.


10. Who writes your reviews?

Our reviews are written anonymously by neurosurgeons and clinical scientists around the world.
We don’t sign them — not out of secrecy, but out of principle.
Anonymity protects intellectual honesty:
It allows reviewers to criticize flawed methods, weak logic, or institutional dogmas without fear of backlash or reputation games.
Without names, what matters is the reasoning — not the résumé.
We believe this makes our critiques sharper, freer, and more scientific.